Social Surveys – Benefits and Drawbacks. The Theoretical Benefits Of Personal Studies

Social Surveys – Benefits and Drawbacks. The Theoretical Benefits Of Personal Studies

Personal studies are really a quantitative, positivist research technique composed of structured questionnaires and interviews. This post considers the theoretical, practical and ethical benefits and drawbacks of employing social studies in social research.

Detachment, Objectivity and Validity

Positivists favour questionnaires because they’re a detached and objective (unbiased) technique, where in actuality the sociologist’s individual participation with participants is held to the very least.

Hypothesis Testing

Questionnaires are especially helpful for testing hypotheses about cause and impact relationships between various factors, since the fact they are quantifiable permits us to find correlations.

For instance, predicated on federal federal federal federal government data on academic accomplishment we all know that white males on complimentary class dishes achieve at a considerably reduced degree than Chinese girls on complimentary class dishes. We fairly hypothesise that it is because variations in parental attitudes – Chinese moms and dads may appreciate training more extremely, as well as might be stricter with kids regarding research when compared with white parents. Good questionnaire design and appropriate sampling would allow us to try this hypothesis out. Good sampling would further let us see if those white working course guys that do well have moms and dads with comparable attitudes to those Chinese girls that do well.


Questionnaires permit the researcher to get information from the number that is large of, therefore the outcomes must be more agent for the wider populace than with increased qualitative techniques. Nevertheless, this all depends upon appropriate sampling strategies getting used together with scientists having understanding of exactly how really completes the questionnaire.


Questionnaires are usually viewed as one of the most dependable methods of data collection – then they should give similar results if repeated by another researcher. There are 2 reasons that are main this:

Once the scientific studies are duplicated, you can easily make use of the precise exact same questionnaire meaning the participants are expected exactly the same concerns in identical purchase in addition they have actually the exact same range of responses.

With self-completion concerns, specially those delivered by post, there isn’t any researcher present to influence the outcomes.

The dependability of questionnaires implies that whenever we do find variations in responses, then we could be fairly sure that it is because the viewpoints associated with participants have actually changed in the long run. Because of this, questionnaires certainly are a method that is good performing longitudinal research where modification as time passes is calculated.

Practical Advantages

Questionnaires certainly are a cheap and quick method of collecting considerable amounts of data from more and more individuals, even in the event they’re commonly dispersed geographically in the event that questionnaire is delivered by post or carried out online. It is hard to observe how any kind of research technique could offer 10s of millions of reactions as is the actual situation utilizing the British census that is national.

Into the context of training, Connor and Dewson (2001) posted almost 4000 questionnaires to pupils at 14 degree organizations within their research for the facets which influenced working course choices to go to college.

With self-completion questionnaires you don’t have to recruit and train interviewers, which decreases expense.

The information is quick to analyse as soon as it is often collected. With on line questionnaires, pre-coded questions may be updated real time.

Ethical Problems

Whenever a respondent is served with a questionnaire, its fairly apparent that scientific studies are happened, so informed permission is not generally issue provided that researchers are truthful in regards to the reason for the investigation.

It’s also a fairly unobtrusive technique, because of the detachment for the researcher, which is quite a straightforward matter for participants to simply ignore questionnaires when they don’t like to finish them.

Theoretical Drawbacks of Questionnaires

Dilemmas validity that is affecting Interpretivists make an amount of criticisms of questionnaires

Firstly there was the imposition problem – whenever researcher chooses the concerns, they have been determining what is very important as opposed to the respondent, in accordance with shut ended concerns the respondent has got to fit their responses into what’s being offered. The end result is the fact that respondent might not be in a position to go to town into the method in which would you like to. The dwelling for the questionnaire therefore distorts the respondents’ definitions and undermines the credibility associated with information

Next, Interpretivists argue that the detached nature of questionnaires together with not enough close contact between researcher and respondent ensures that it is impossible to make sure that the participants are interpreting the concerns into the same manner as the researcher. This is also true where highly complex subjects are participating – If we tick ‘yes’ that i’m Christian’ – this can suggest a variety of things – from my being baptised yet not practising or really thinking to being truly a devout Fundamentalist. With this good reason Interpretivists typically choose qualitative practices where researchers can be found to make clear definitions and probe deeper.

Thirdly, scientists may possibly not be current to check on whether participants are providing answers that are socially desirable or just lying, or to always check that is really finishing the questionnaire. At the least with interviews scientists can be found to test through to these dilemmas (by watching body gestures or probing further as an example)

Problems representativeness that is affecting

Postal questionnaires in particular can suffer with a response rate that is low. As an example, Shere Hite’s (1991) research of ‘love, passion, and psychological violence’ within the America sent 100, 000 questionnaires but just 4.5% of those had been came back.

All self-completion questionnaires additionally suffer with the issue of a self-selecting test which makes the research unrepresentative – particular forms of individuals are more prone to finish questionnaires – literate individuals as an example, individuals with the required time, or individuals who have a confident feeling of self-esteem whenever completing questionnaires.

Practical Difficulties With Questionnaires

The truth that questionnaires have to be brief means it is possible to just ever get fairly trivial information from their store, therefore for most subjects, they are going to should be coupled with write my more qualitative ways to attain more understanding.

Although questionnaires are really a form that is relatively cheap of data, it could be essential to provide incentives for folks to go back them.

Structured Interviews may also be significantly more expensive than self-completion questionnaires.

Ethical Difficulties With questionnaires

They have been most readily useful avoided whenever researching sensitive subjects.

Related Posts

An Introduction to Social Surveys – Definition and Basic Types of Survey